The Legal Liability of Air Traffic Controllers Essay

The Legal Liability of Air Traffic Controllers - Essay ExampleTo delay this, they used black box information, traffic cams, computer simulations and the phonation of the pilot himself, who died in the crash attributed the accident to such diverse causes and engine failure, flaws in building complex materials and terrorism.2 After 3 years of investigation the NTSB attributed the catastrophe to structural damage caused or exacerbated by stir up turbulence with black box information and the voice of the pilot himself, who died in the crash, confirming this.The first contestation made on the cockpit voice recorder ,disclosed by the FTSB, was a reference by the pilot to the blank space between him and the plane in front of him, a Japan Airlines Boeing747 which had taken off less than 2 minutes before him, responding to the air traffic controllers concerns active conjure turbulence.Lift is generated by a difference of pressure over the surface of the wing. The lower pressure happens above the wing surface while the high pressure is underneath. This differential causes the air to roll off the wings and trail down from the tips, forming two vortices like tornadoes, rotating out in different directions. Like the wake of a ship, two vessels that pass each other have observable wave action. Boats do it, and so do planes. When one plane passes too well to another it encounters the wake of air waves. You cant see it, but you feel it. A plane with a lesser wing span looses it mirrored directions, like the wake of a ship. Two vessels that pass each other have observable wave action. Boats do it, and so do planes. When one plane passes too nearly to another it encounters the wake of air waves. You cant see it, but you feel it. A plane with a lesser wing span loses its righting moment. Displaced air has some legerdemain of predictable movement, however like water, that motion is highly fluid, being influenced by many factors. Such turbulence compromises the ability o f pilots to control aircraft, navigators to direct it and the safety of passengers in planes. The range of an airborne wake from a large plane is less than 5 miles.4The pilot acknowledged the concern of the ATCO on the radio. It states in the Federal line Regulations Sec. 91.3a - Responsibility and authority of the pilot in command.The pilot in command of an aircraft is directly responsible for, and is the final authority as to, the operation of that aircraft. According to the pilots CVR statement there was going be a lot of time between him and that Boeing 747 out in front. He wasnt doing anything wrong. He was just a little contiguous to the scheduled time of departure. In the immediate post 9/11 context, with altered airport security procedures, this was relevant. The full text of the CVR was not published creative thinker there was going be a lot of time between him and that Boeing 747 out in front. He wasnt doing anything wrong. He was just a little side by side(predicate) to the scheduled time of departure.Two minutes later he was dead.While specific aircraft regulations can hold blameless the owners of aircraft, (see49 USC 44112 (formerly 49 USC 1404)), the law of torts still allows for the compositors case of companies on the basis of negligence. AFCOs are responsible for the safe routing of planes within their district during their scheduled assignments, they are not responsible for t